Ivaronix
§ FOR LAWYERS, IN-HOUSE COUNSEL, FOUNDERS · LIVE ON 0G · 174+ receipts anchored

The AI second opinion you can give your lawyer.

Drop a contract · the specialist reviews inside a sealed enclave · you leave with a receipt anyone can verify in 10 seconds — even after the document is gone.

Every run anchors a public receipt on 0G Chain. Open the receipt URL on a different machine, in a different browser, with no Ivaronix account, and the four cryptographic checks still pass. That is the proof you can hand opposing counsel.

SAMPLE RECEIPT · ANONYMIZED · NOT A REAL DOC

Vendor MSA — annual auto-renewal review

FULLY VERIFIEDhigh-stakes
  1. §3.2 · 180-day notice window — asymmetric; counterparty cancels with 30 days, you give 6 months.
  2. §3.3 · 7% annual price uplift — exceeds market standard 3-5%.
  3. §5.1 · negative-option clause — continued use after term equals consent to a new term. Hidden in "Miscellaneous."
Risk Level: high
§ 01 · WHY THIS EXISTS

Same AI. Different ending.

A New York lawyer filed a brief in 2023 citing six cases ChatGPT had hallucinated. The judge sanctioned the lawyer and his firm. NYT front page. The AI wasn't the problem — the absence of proof was.

ChatGPT · Mata v. Avianca pattern

  1. Lawyer pastes brief and asks "are these citations real?"
  2. Model "confirms" from its training data — no external check.
  3. Brief filed. Cases turn out to be fictional.
  4. No artifact. No proof of process. No way to defend "I trusted the tool."
  5. Sanction. Headline. Firm pays $5,000. Career damage.

Ivaronix · legal-citation-verifier (architecture)

  1. Lawyer drops brief into a sealed-enclave specialist.
  2. Each cite is routed through an HTTP fetch to CourtListener + Cornell LII via the web_fetch builtin.
  3. Runtime enforcement gates the verdict on a successful fetch; parse-only outputs are flagged on the receipt.
  4. Receipt URL + four-light proof + signer wallet + chain anchor produced for every brief.
  5. Anyone can re-run the same HTTP cross-check from the receipt transcript.
§ 02 · THE LEGAL CLUSTER

Five skills, one workflow.

Each skill ships with a Zod-validated manifest, a 90/10 creator/treasury fee split, and a receipt that anchors on the 0G Aristotle mainnet.

contract-renewal-clause-detector

standard

Scan a contract for every auto-renewal, auto-extension, evergreen, and negative-option-billing clause. Flags hidden renewal in boilerplate, asymmetric notice periods, and price escalation at renewal. Part of the Ivaronix legal cluster. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

legal-citation-verifier

high-stakes

Parse a legal brief or memo for citations and verify existence by HTTP fetch to CourtListener and Cornell LII via the web_fetch builtin. Runtime enforcement gates each verdict on a successful fetch; parse-only outputs are flagged on the receipt. Supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

nda-triage-reviewer

standard

Triage an NDA in seconds. Classifies as mutual or one-way, extracts term length, governing law, jurisdiction, exclusions, and red flags. Built for founders and in-house counsel reviewing 5-10 NDAs/week from vendors, customers, and partners. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

private-doc-review

standard

Review a private document (contract, lease, NDA, vendor agreement, terms of service) and surface concrete risks, missing protections, and clauses that disadvantage the asking party. Anchor of the Ivaronix legal cluster. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

term-sheet-risk-scanner

high-stakes

Scan a Series A/B term sheet for liquidation preferences, participation rights, anti-dilution, option pool expansion, founder vesting reset, drag-along, MFN, pay-to-play, and protective provisions. Returns structured findings with founder-impact estimates. Runs on the sovereign 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B model via 0G Compute. Supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

§ 03 · THE WORKFLOW

Drop · Run · Verify · Share · Archive.

Same loop a paralegal already follows — except the receipt is cryptographic and re-verifiable on any machine for as long as the chain stands.

STEP 1

Drop

A contract, brief, NDA, term sheet, or memo. Burn mode is on by default — the plaintext is encrypted before it leaves the browser.

STEP 2

Run

The specialist skill runs inside a TEE-attested 0G Compute provider. Consensus tier (standard / high-stakes) is chosen per skill.

STEP 3

Verify

Four cryptographic checks: storage hash, compute attestation, TEE binding, chain anchor. All green = process verified.

STEP 4

Share

A public receipt URL. Opening it on a different machine triggers the same four checks against the same chain.

STEP 5

Archive

The chain anchor is permanent. The blob lives on 0G Storage with 1-year retention default; longer retention on the way.

§ 04 · WHAT THE RECEIPT SHOWS

Five real examples, anonymized.

One example per legal skill, redacted enough to share. Click any example to open its receipt URL on a fresh machine and re-verify the four cryptographic checks.

private-doc-review

ANCHORED

Before: Residential lease with auto-renewal language and ambiguous notice clauses.

After: Multiple findings surfaced · risks ranked · evidence quoted from the document · receipt signer-verified on chain.

Open receipt /r/53 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33270447 · v0.4.0 refresh proof

contract-renewal-clause-detector

ANCHORED

Before: 12-month vendor MSA with §3.2 180-day auto-renewal, §3.3 7%-or-CPI uplift, §5.1 buried negative-option clause.

After: JSON findings array per clause · risk_level + notice_period_days + exit_cost_estimate · structured for downstream cap-table tooling.

Open receipt /r/55 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33270838 · standard tier

nda-triage-reviewer

ANCHORED

Before: Cayman exempted LP one-way NDA with perpetual term, $1M liquidated damages, broad "Confidential Information" definition.

After: Triage object · type/term_years/governing_law/jurisdiction/exclusions/red_flags · signature_recommendation: refuse.

Open receipt /r/58 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33271110 · standard tier

term-sheet-risk-scanner

ANCHORED

Before: Series B with 3x participating no-cap liquidation preference + full-ratchet anti-dilution + 4-year vesting reset.

After: Founder-hostile findings · founder_impact_estimate per clause · negotiation_recommendation: walk if not changed.

Open receipt /r/62 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33271825 · high-stakes 5-role tier

legal-citation-verifier

ANCHORED

Before: Brief with 3 hallucinated cases (Patterson v. Aramburu · Glenwood Capital · Wexler v. Brody-Tonelli) mixed among real cites — the Mata v. Avianca pattern.

After: Parsed citations · runtime gate verifies each one by HTTP fetch to CourtListener and Cornell LII before the verdict is allowed to anchor · parse-only outputs are flagged on the receipt. External database is the source of truth — the model never decides existence from training memory.

Open receipt /r/64 →
Citation parsing proof · runtime web_fetch enforcement gates verdicts on mainnet runs

§ 05 · WHO THIS IS FOR

Three personas. One product.

Lawyers, in-house counsel, and founders use this differently — but each lands on the same receipt URL when the work is done.

§ FOR LAWYERS

A second opinion you can show your malpractice carrier.

Solo and small-firm lawyers carry malpractice exposure that scales with the volume and complexity of documents they review. The pressure is real and the staffing is thin. Ivaronix is the second-read pass you would assign a junior associate if you had one — except every finding lands attached to a receipt your carrier, your client, or opposing counsel can re-verify independently. When the inevitable disagreement comes about what the contract said, you do not point at a chat log. You point at a chain-anchored URL with four cryptographic checks. The receipt does not replace your judgment; it documents that the AI's review process was followed, exactly, on this specific document, at this specific time, by this specific signer. That is the difference between AI as a tool and AI as a defensible workflow.

Customer quotes are on hold until opted-in users approve attribution. We do not fabricate testimonials.
§ FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL

The vendor-contract throughput problem, finally measured.

In-house teams of two to ten people review hundreds of vendor agreements per quarter. The work is largely the same five categories (auto-renewal traps, indemnification scope, IP carve-outs, term mismatches, governing-law misalignments) and the cost of missing one is asymmetric. Ivaronix gives your team a structured first pass on every incoming contract: a JSON findings object per skill, anchored to a public receipt, that flows naturally into a CLM or ticketing system. The 90/10 fee-split keeps the math simple: a 0.015 OG high-stakes review earns the creator 0.0135 OG and routes 0.0015 OG to the protocol treasury. You pay per anchored receipt, not per seat.

Customer quotes are on hold until opted-in users approve attribution. We do not fabricate testimonials.
§ FOR FOUNDERS

The contract review you can run before the partner-track lawyer bills you.

Founders sign more legal documents in their first eighteen months than most people sign in a lifetime, exactly when paying $1,200/hour for the right partner-track lawyer is hardest to justify. Ivaronix runs the first pass on the NDA, the vendor MSA, the term sheet, the lease offer, the customer order form. You get a structured findings object with risk levels and concrete asks before you forward the document to your outside counsel. The receipt URL becomes the artifact in your data room — when an investor asks how you reviewed the Series A term sheet, you do not say "my friend looked at it." You hand them a receipt anchored on chain, signed by your wallet, with each finding traceable to a specific clause.

Customer quotes are on hold until opted-in users approve attribution. We do not fabricate testimonials.
§ 06 · HONEST DISCLAIMERS

What this product does not do.

Naming the limits up front is part of what makes the receipt trustworthy. Anything not on this list, we do.

  • We do not give legal advice.
    Every skill description carries this line: 'Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.' The skill produces a structured analysis; an attorney still makes the call.
  • We do not claim 'court-admissible.'
    PDF receipts are printable and structured for legal review. They are not notarized — a receipt is evidence of process, not a notarized affidavit. Pair with a notary partner if the workflow requires one.
  • legal-citation-verifier verifies existence, not legal holding.
    Each citation is verified by HTTP fetch to CourtListener and Cornell LII via web_fetch. The model never decides existence from training memory; the external database is the source of truth. Runtime enforcement gates each verdict on a successful fetch, and parse-only outputs are flagged on the receipt. The skill confirms a case exists at the cited court; it does not confirm the brief's proposition is what the case actually stands for.
  • We do not store your document in plaintext.
    Burn mode is on by default. The document is AES-256-GCM encrypted before it leaves the browser. Only the hash and your encrypted-key blob touch the chain. Even Ivaronix operators cannot read the document without your key.
  • We do not promise the AI is correct.
    The receipt proves the AI's process — TEE attestation, signer wallet, chain anchor — not that the AI's answer is correct. 'Process verified' is not 'answer verified.' That distinction is on every receipt page.
  • We run on two networks.
    Aristotle mainnet (chainId 16661) is the production network — every paid run anchors here. Galileo testnet (chainId 16602) stays live for developer iteration without spending real OG. The sovereign 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B provider serves mainnet runs; deepseek-v4-pro and the rest of the catalog roll out incrementally as smoke tests confirm each provider route.
§ 07 · PRICING

Per-receipt $0G fee · tiered by rigor.

No subscription, no seat licenses, no minimum commitment. You pay per receipt; the creator earns 90% of net, the protocol treasury earns 10%.

TierWhat runsPer-receipt cost
quickSingle-role pass · cheap iteration · structured findings.~0.0005 OG
standard3-role consensus · analyst + critic + judge · the legal-cluster default.~0.005 OG
high-stakes5-role consensus · analyst + critic + risk-reviewer + evidence-checker + judge · for term sheets and citations.~0.015 OG
audit6-role adversarial top tier · adds red-team-critic · premium reviews of complex agreements.~0.025 OG

Per-skill prices are set by the creator and enforced on-chain via the SkillPricing contract on Aristotle mainnet. Commoditized skills can land closer to a 70/30 split via the same override.

§ 08 · FAQ

Hard questions, answered honestly.

The objections we hear most often from working lawyers.

Is the document stored on a public blockchain?

No. Burn mode encrypts the plaintext with AES-256-GCM before it leaves the browser. The encrypted blob lives on 0G Storage; only the keccak256 hash anchors on chain. Even Ivaronix operators cannot read the document without your key. Per CLAUDE.md §7, every receipt records the keyFingerprint so you can prove the encryption parameters later.

What if the AI is wrong about a finding?

The receipt proves the AI's PROCESS — that the inference was TEE-attested, the result was signer-bound, the anchor landed on chain — not that the AI's ANSWER is correct. Every receipt page makes this distinction explicit. If a finding is wrong, you contest it the same way you would contest any structured analysis: with your own legal judgment and, ideally, by re-running the skill at a higher consensus tier.

Can opposing counsel verify a receipt without my help?

Yes. Open the receipt URL on any machine with any browser — no Ivaronix account required. The page server-side fetches the receipt body from 0G Storage, re-runs the four cryptographic checks against the same chain, and renders the four-light row. The CLI command `pnpm ivaronix receipt verify <id> --tee-independent` re-runs the TEE attestation against the original 0G Compute provider for full independent verification.

What happens if 0G goes away?

The receipt protocol is open-source under Apache 2.0. The polyglot canonical-hash implementation (TypeScript, Python, Rust) is byte-equal across all three runtimes. The chain anchor is on 0G Chain today, but the receipt schema is EVM-agnostic and the `IReceiptRegistry` abstraction supports a multi-chain fallback path for any future EVM chain.

Do I need crypto to use this?

Today, yes: you need a wallet to sign the receipt that anchors on chain. A custodial-wallet path via Privy is on the post-launch roadmap so email/Google/Apple auth lets a lawyer with no crypto background still produce signed receipts (managed-on-behalf signer role on the receipt).

How much does a single receipt actually cost?

Indicative numbers in the pricing table above — somewhere between 0.0005 OG (quick) and 0.025 OG (audit). Real numbers depend on what 0G Compute charges per inference, what gas costs on chain that day, and which tier you pick. The 90/10 creator/treasury split is enforced on-chain via SkillRunPayment; nothing is taken at the application layer.

§ 09 · YOUR FIRST RECEIPT

Run your first private-doc-review.

Drop a contract. See the four lights. Share the receipt URL with someone who needs to trust the work.

Run private-doc-review →See all 5 legal skills

This skill runs against the sovereign 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B model on the 0G Aristotle mainnet via 0G Compute. The receipt structure and verification path are identical no matter which provider in the catalog answered the run.