Ivaronix
§ FOR LAWYERS, IN-HOUSE COUNSEL, FOUNDERS · LIVE ON 0G GALILEO TESTNET · 44+ receipts anchored

The AI second opinion you can give your lawyer.

Drop a contract · the specialist reviews inside a sealed enclave · you leave with a receipt anyone can verify in 10 seconds — even after the document is gone.

Every run anchors a public receipt on 0G Chain. Open the receipt URL on a different machine, in a different browser, with no Ivaronix account, and the four cryptographic checks still pass. That is the proof you can hand opposing counsel.

SAMPLE RECEIPT · ANONYMIZED · NOT A REAL DOC

Vendor MSA — annual auto-renewal review

FULLY VERIFIEDhigh-stakes
  1. §3.2 · 180-day notice window — asymmetric; counterparty cancels with 30 days, you give 6 months.
  2. §3.3 · 7% annual price uplift — exceeds market standard 3-5%.
  3. §5.1 · negative-option clause — continued use after term equals consent to a new term. Hidden in "Miscellaneous."
Risk Level: high
§ 01 · WHY THIS EXISTS

Same AI. Different ending.

A New York lawyer filed a brief in 2023 citing six cases ChatGPT had hallucinated. The judge sanctioned the lawyer and his firm. NYT front page. The AI wasn't the problem — the absence of proof was.

ChatGPT · Mata v. Avianca pattern

  1. Lawyer pastes brief and asks "are these citations real?"
  2. Model "confirms" from its training data — no external check.
  3. Brief filed. Cases turn out to be fictional.
  4. No artifact. No proof of process. No way to defend "I trusted the tool."
  5. Sanction. Headline. Firm pays $5,000. Career damage.

Ivaronix · legal-citation-verifier (architecture)

  1. Lawyer drops brief into a sealed-enclave specialist.
  2. Architecture routes each cite through HTTP to CourtListener + Cornell LII via the web_fetch builtin.
  3. Testnet caveat: Qwen 2.5 7B does not yet reliably emit tool_calls; runtime web_fetch enforcement is queued as this skill's mainnet-promotion gate — testnet verdicts are heuristic parsing only.
  4. Receipt URL + four-light proof + signer wallet + chain anchor land regardless.
  5. Re-verification path identical; the HTTP cross-check landed on mainnet runtime.
§ 02 · THE LEGAL CLUSTER

Five skills, one workflow.

Each skill ships with a Zod-validated manifest, an honest scope note about Qwen 2.5 7B testnet output, and a 90/10 creator/treasury fee-split anchored to the operator passport.

contract-renewal-clause-detector

standard

Scan a contract for every auto-renewal, auto-extension, evergreen, and negative-option-billing clause. Flags hidden renewal in boilerplate, asymmetric notice periods, and price escalation at renewal. Part of the Ivaronix legal cluster on Galileo testnet. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

legal-citation-verifier

high-stakes

Parse a legal brief or memo for citations and produce best-effort structured output. Architecture routes case-existence checks through HTTP to CourtListener and Cornell LII via the web_fetch builtin; however, on Galileo testnet (Qwen 2.5 7B) the model does not yet consistently emit web_fetch tool_calls, so verdicts are heuristic until the runtime enforcement gate ships (queued · QA_PROOF_PACK/legal-cluster/citation-verifier-audit.md). Treat output as parsing assistance, not verified citation-existence proof. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

nda-triage-reviewer

standard

Triage an NDA in seconds. Classifies as mutual or one-way, extracts term length, governing law, jurisdiction, exclusions, and red flags. Built for founders and in-house counsel reviewing 5-10 NDAs/week from vendors, customers, and partners. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

private-doc-review

standard

Review a private document (contract, lease, NDA, vendor agreement, terms of service) and surface concrete risks, missing protections, and clauses that disadvantage the asking party. Anchor of the Ivaronix legal cluster on Galileo testnet. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

term-sheet-risk-scanner

high-stakes

Scan a Series A/B term sheet for liquidation preferences, participation rights, anti-dilution, option pool expansion, founder vesting reset, drag-along, MFN, pay-to-play, and protective provisions. Returns structured findings with founder-impact estimates. Testnet output may miss subtle terms — production-grade scanning requires a larger model on mainnet; this skill validates the pipeline today and ships with upgraded models on mainnet promotion. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

§ 03 · THE WORKFLOW

Drop · Run · Verify · Share · Archive.

Same loop a paralegal already follows — except the receipt is cryptographic and re-verifiable on any machine for as long as the chain stands.

STEP 1

Drop

A contract, brief, NDA, term sheet, or memo. Burn mode is on by default — the plaintext is encrypted before it leaves the browser.

STEP 2

Run

The specialist skill runs inside a TEE-attested 0G Compute provider. Consensus tier (standard / high-stakes) is chosen per skill.

STEP 3

Verify

Four cryptographic checks: storage hash, compute attestation, TEE binding, chain anchor. All green = process verified.

STEP 4

Share

A public receipt URL. Opening it on a different machine triggers the same four checks against the same chain.

STEP 5

Archive

The chain anchor is permanent. The blob lives on 0G Storage with 1-year retention default; longer retention on the way.

§ 04 · WHAT THE RECEIPT SHOWS

Five real examples, anonymized.

One example per legal skill, redacted enough to share. Click any example to open its receipt URL on a fresh machine and re-verify the four cryptographic checks.

private-doc-review

ANCHORED

Before: Residential lease with auto-renewal language and ambiguous notice clauses.

After: Multiple findings surfaced · risks ranked · evidence quoted from the document · receipt signer-verified on Galileo.

Open receipt /r/53 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33270447 · v0.4.0 refresh proof

contract-renewal-clause-detector

ANCHORED

Before: 12-month vendor MSA with §3.2 180-day auto-renewal, §3.3 7%-or-CPI uplift, §5.1 buried negative-option clause.

After: JSON findings array per clause · risk_level + notice_period_days + exit_cost_estimate · structured for downstream cap-table tooling.

Open receipt /r/55 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33270838 · standard tier

nda-triage-reviewer

ANCHORED

Before: Cayman exempted LP one-way NDA with perpetual term, $1M liquidated damages, broad "Confidential Information" definition.

After: Triage object · type/term_years/governing_law/jurisdiction/exclusions/red_flags · signature_recommendation: refuse.

Open receipt /r/58 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33271110 · standard tier

term-sheet-risk-scanner

ANCHORED

Before: Series B with 3x participating no-cap liquidation preference + full-ratchet anti-dilution + 4-year vesting reset.

After: Founder-hostile findings · founder_impact_estimate per clause · negotiation_recommendation: walk if not changed.

Open receipt /r/62 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33271825 · high-stakes 5-role tier

legal-citation-verifier · PARTIAL (testnet)

ANCHORED

Before: Brief with 3 hallucinated cases (Patterson v. Aramburu · Glenwood Capital · Wexler v. Brody-Tonelli) mixed among real cites — the Mata v. Avianca pattern.

After: Citation PARSING works (B+); CASE-EXISTENCE verification is queued as this skill's mainnet-promotion gate. Testnet receipt 64 captures the parsed citation set but the Qwen 2.5 7B model did not emit web_fetch tool_calls — verdicts are heuristic. Re-run on mainnet once the runtime web_fetch enforcement gate ships (per Q9 audit · MAINNET_PERFECT_PLAN §3 keeps external-DB-as-ground-truth design intact).

Open receipt /r/64 →
Anchored 2026-05-14 · block 33272170 · TESTNET PARTIAL · runtime web_fetch enforcement queued

§ 05 · WHO THIS IS FOR

Three personas. One product.

Lawyers, in-house counsel, and founders use this differently — but each lands on the same receipt URL when the work is done.

§ FOR LAWYERS

A second opinion you can show your malpractice carrier.

Solo and small-firm lawyers carry malpractice exposure that scales with the volume and complexity of documents they review. The pressure is real and the staffing is thin. Ivaronix is the second-read pass you would assign a junior associate if you had one — except every finding lands attached to a receipt your carrier, your client, or opposing counsel can re-verify independently. When the inevitable disagreement comes about what the contract said, you do not point at a chat log. You point at a chain-anchored URL with four cryptographic checks. The receipt does not replace your judgment; it documents that the AI's review process was followed, exactly, on this specific document, at this specific time, by this specific signer. That is the difference between AI as a tool and AI as a defensible workflow.

Testimonial space · queued for the first opted-in user of this persona. We will never fabricate a quote here.
§ FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL

The vendor-contract throughput problem, finally measured.

In-house teams of two to ten people review hundreds of vendor agreements per quarter. The work is largely the same five categories — auto-renewal traps, indemnification scope, IP carve-outs, term mismatches, governing-law misalignments — and the cost of missing one is asymmetric. Ivaronix gives your team a structured first pass on every incoming contract: a JSON findings object per skill, anchored to a public receipt, that flows naturally into a CLM or ticketing system. The 90/10 fee-split makes the math straightforward: a $99 contract review skill earns the skill author $89.10, the protocol takes $9.90, you pay only when a receipt actually anchors. No per-seat licenses to negotiate, no sales motion, no procurement approval cycle to add.

Testimonial space · queued for the first opted-in user of this persona. We will never fabricate a quote here.
§ FOR FOUNDERS

The contract review you can run before the partner-track lawyer bills you.

Founders sign more legal documents in their first eighteen months than most people sign in a lifetime — and at exactly the moment when paying $1,200/hour for the right partner-track lawyer is hardest to justify. Ivaronix runs the first pass on the NDA, the vendor MSA, the term sheet, the lease offer, the customer order form. You get a structured findings object with risk levels and concrete asks before you forward the document to your outside counsel. The receipt URL becomes the artifact in your data room — when an investor asks how you reviewed the Series A term sheet, you do not say "my friend looked at it." You hand them a receipt anchored on Galileo testnet, signed by your wallet, with each finding traceable to a specific clause.

Testimonial space · queued for the first opted-in user of this persona. We will never fabricate a quote here.
§ 06 · HONEST DISCLAIMERS

What this product does not do.

Naming the limits up front is part of what makes the receipt trustworthy. Anything not on this list, we do.

  • We do not give legal advice.
    Every skill description carries this line: 'Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.' The skill produces a structured analysis; an attorney still makes the call.
  • We do not claim 'court-admissible.'
    PDF receipts are printable and structured for legal review. They are not notarized; we do not yet integrate a notary partner. A receipt is evidence of process, not a notarized affidavit.
  • legal-citation-verifier is PARTIAL on testnet today.
    Design: every cite routes through HTTP to CourtListener + Cornell LII via web_fetch (the external DB is ground truth · the AI never decides existence from training memory · this design survives every model upgrade). Today on Galileo: parsing works (B+) but the Qwen 2.5 7B model does not reliably emit tool_calls, so the runtime cannot enforce the HTTP cross-check yet. The runtime enforcement gate is this skill's mainnet-promotion blocker; we surface it openly per CLAUDE.md §1 rather than ship a hallucination-prone verdict as LIVE. Q9 audit at QA_PROOF_PACK/testnet/ai-quality/legal-citation-verifier.md documents the rating + fix path.
  • We do not store your document in plaintext.
    Burn mode is on by default. The document is AES-256-GCM encrypted before it leaves the browser. Only the hash and your encrypted-key blob touch the chain. Even Ivaronix operators cannot read the document without your key.
  • We do not promise the AI is correct.
    The receipt proves the AI's process — TEE attestation, signer wallet, chain anchor — not that the AI's answer is correct. 'Process verified' is not 'answer verified.' That distinction is on every receipt page.
  • We do not run on mainnet today.
    Galileo testnet only. The model is Qwen 2.5 7B — strong enough to validate the pipeline, not strong enough to catch every subtle clause. Mainnet promotion ships with the larger model catalog (0GM-1.0 + deepseek-v4-pro) after smoke tests confirm the route.
§ 07 · PRICING

Per-receipt $0G fee · tiered by rigor.

No subscription, no seat licenses, no minimum commitment. You pay per receipt; the creator earns 90% of net, the protocol treasury earns 10%.

TierWhat runsPer-receipt cost
quickSingle-role pass · cheap iteration · structured findings.~0.0005 OG
standard3-role consensus · analyst + critic + judge · the legal-cluster default.~0.005 OG
high-stakes5-role consensus · analyst + critic + risk-reviewer + evidence-checker + judge · for term sheets and citations.~0.015 OG
audit6-role adversarial top tier · adds red-team-critic · premium reviews of complex agreements.~0.025 OG

Indicative numbers — the first 50 users price-discover the actual figures. The contract (SkillPricing on mainnet) supports per-skill override; some commoditized skills will land closer to 70/30.

§ 08 · FAQ

Hard questions, answered honestly.

The objections we hear most often from working lawyers.

Is the document stored on a public blockchain?

No. Burn mode encrypts the plaintext with AES-256-GCM before it leaves the browser. The encrypted blob lives on 0G Storage; only the keccak256 hash anchors on chain. Even Ivaronix operators cannot read the document without your key. Per CLAUDE.md §7, every receipt records the keyFingerprint so you can prove the encryption parameters later.

What if the AI is wrong about a finding?

The receipt proves the AI's PROCESS — that the inference was TEE-attested, the result was signer-bound, the anchor landed on chain — not that the AI's ANSWER is correct. Every receipt page makes this distinction explicit. If a finding is wrong, you contest it the same way you would contest any structured analysis: with your own legal judgment and, ideally, by re-running the skill at a higher consensus tier.

Can opposing counsel verify a receipt without my help?

Yes. Open the receipt URL on any machine with any browser — no Ivaronix account required. The page server-side fetches the receipt body from 0G Storage, re-runs the four cryptographic checks against the same chain, and renders the four-light row. The CLI command `pnpm ivaronix receipt verify <id> --tee-independent` re-runs the TEE attestation against the original 0G Compute provider for full independent verification.

What happens if 0G goes away?

The receipt protocol is open-source under Apache 2.0. The polyglot canonical-hash implementation (TypeScript, Python, Rust) is byte-equal across all three runtimes; the Rust verifier ships to crates.io as `ivaronix-verifier`. The chain anchor is on 0G Chain today, but the receipt schema supports any EVM-compatible chain — a mainnet fallback is in our roadmap as part of the `IReceiptRegistry` abstraction.

Do I need crypto to use this?

Today, yes — you need a wallet to sign the receipt that anchors on chain. We are working on a custodial-wallet path via Privy so email/Google/Apple auth lets a lawyer with no crypto background still produce signed receipts (managed-on-behalf signer role on the receipt). That ships post-grant.

How much does a single receipt actually cost?

Indicative numbers in the pricing table above — somewhere between 0.0005 OG (quick) and 0.025 OG (audit). Real numbers depend on what 0G Compute charges per inference, what gas costs on chain that day, and which tier you pick. The 90/10 creator/treasury split is enforced on-chain via SkillRunPayment; nothing is taken at the application layer.

§ 09 · YOUR FIRST RECEIPT

Run your first private-doc-review.

Drop a contract. See the four lights. Share the receipt URL with someone who needs to trust the work.

Run private-doc-review →See all 5 legal skills

Today this skill runs on Galileo testnet against Qwen 2.5 7B — strong enough to validate the pipeline end-to-end, not strong enough to catch every subtle clause. Mainnet promotion lands the larger model catalog; the receipt structure and verification path stay identical.