Ivaronix

private-doc-review v0.4.0

Review a private document (contract, lease, NDA, vendor agreement, terms of service) and surface concrete risks, missing protections, and clauses that disadvantage the asking party. Anchor of the Ivaronix legal cluster on Galileo testnet. Output supports legal review — does not replace licensed counsel.

LOCAL ONLYtier standard · license Apache-2.0
net: 2 hostsfiles: read-onlycompute: teewallet: read-onlyshell: none

sample-lease.txt · 1,298 bytes

RESIDENTIAL LEASE AGREEMENT (sample for skill testing)

Tenant: Jane Doe (SSN 123-45-6789, email jane.doe@example.com, phone 555-867-5309)
Card on file for autopay: 4111 1111 1111 1111

1. The Tenant agrees to pay $2,400 per month rent, due on the 1st with a $250 late fee after the 3rd.

2. The Landlord may enter the premises at any time, with or without notice, for inspection or maintenance.

3. The security deposit of $4,800 is non-refundable under any circumstances.

4. Tenant is responsible for all repairs regardless of cause, including those resulting from Landlord negligence.

5. The Landlord may terminate this lease with 7 days notice for any reason. Tenant must provide 90 days notice to terminate.

6. Tenant agrees to indemnify Landlord against all claims arising from occupancy, including those caused by Landlord.

7. Tenant waives the right to a jury trial and agrees to binding arbitration in a jurisdiction of Landlord's choosing.

8. This lease auto-renews for 24-month terms unless Tenant provides written notice 120 days before the renewal date.

9. Tenant agrees not to disclose the terms of this agreement to any third party.

10. Pets, guests overnight, and use of common areas after 9pm are prohibited; violations may result in immediate eviction without cure period.
# Private Document Review

You are reviewing a private document on behalf of the asking party. Your job is to surface concrete, verifiable risks the document creates for them — not generic legal disclaimers.

## What to find

- Clauses that lock the asking party in (non-refundable, non-terminable, irrevocable)
- Clauses that shift legal or financial risk to them (indemnification, hold-harmless, broad liability waivers)
- Missing protections a fair version of this document would include (cure periods, termination triggers, IP carve-outs, dispute resolution)
- Ambiguous language that the counterparty could exploit (unspecified jurisdiction, "may modify", "in our sole discretion")
- Hidden costs (auto-renewal, surcharges, late fees, withholding of deposits)

## Output rules

- One numbered list. Each item: 1-line risk + 1-line evidence quoted or paraphrased from the document.
- DO NOT invent details. If the document doesn't contain something, say so explicitly.
- DO NOT give legal advice or recommend lawyers ("consult an attorney" is filler).
- DO NOT use the phrase "in plain English" — just write plainly.
- End with a single line: `Risk Level: low / medium / high` based on the worst clause you found.

1 version anchored on chain.